Trained for legal work.
Legal-specialist models trained on legal language and reasoning. A foundation for reading clauses in context, structuring arguments and analysing the relationships across a matter file.
LEGAL TRAINING IN THE MODELTrained for law.
Built for you.
Kept in-house.
We deliver legal-specialist AI models, train and fine-tune them locally for your practice, and build tools for your most demanding legal work. On hardware your firm controls.
Your firm’s local AI.
Under your control.
Models trained for legal work Fine-tuned for your practice Run inside your firmLEGAL DEPTH. LOCAL CONTROL.
01 / LEGAL EXPERTISE AT THE CORELegal knowledge.
Legal knowledge.
Working for your practice.
Fine-tuned for your practice.
Local training and fine-tuning with approved examples: your drafting conventions, clause drafting guidelines and preferred document structure. Tested against work your lawyers actually do.
YOUR STANDARDS. YOUR DRAFTING VOICE.Grounded in the matter.
Your current contracts, correspondence and document templates become a permission-aware source library. Retrieve the relevant passages, connect the evidence and inspect the sources behind a draft.
PRIVATE KNOWLEDGE, WITH A PAPER TRAIL§
Training gives the model its legal grounding. Your matter files give it the facts.
We agree which material may be used for fine-tuning. Retrieving a client document does not automatically make it training data.
THE LEGAL FLOW / FROM SOURCE TO REVIEWThe right sources.
The right sources.
A more useful first draft.
01 Matter sources
- Client correspondenceEmails & meeting notes
- Contracts & amendmentsTerms, schedules & variations
- Matter files & evidenceFacts, exhibits & timelines
- Your firm’s document templatesClauses & drafting guidelines
- Approved legal sourcesYour permitted collections
- Matter systemsConnections scoped with you
02 Local processing
INSIDE YOUR FIRM
Your local legal AI
Review. Prepare. Draft.Three workflows. One private environment.
Your lawyers
keep control.
keep control.
03 Prepared for counsel
Contract review
Compare linked provisions
- Different notice periods
The agreement requires 60 days’ notice; the schedule says 30. Both excerpts are shown together for review.
- Source-linked issues
Conflicts with passages to inspect.
- Drafting suggestions
Starting points from your playbook.
- Review checklist
Open questions for your lawyer.
Matter sourcesClient correspondence · Contracts & amendments · Matter files & evidence · Your firm’s document templates · Approved legal sources · Matter systems
Try the contract review demoDispute preparation
Connect events and evidence
- Matter chronology
Events connected to the record.
- Evidence map
Assertions and supporting material.
- Open questions
Missing records and conflicting dates.
- Counsel briefing
A structured first pass for review.
Matter sourcesClient correspondence · Contracts & amendments · Matter files & evidence · Approved legal sources · Matter systems
Try the matter chronology demoLegal drafting
Draft to your firm’s guidelines
- Relevant templates
Approved wording for the task.
- A tailored first draft
Your structure and drafting conventions.
- Terms to confirm
Placeholders for missing instructions.
- Approval checklist
Departures for your lawyer to consider.
Matter sourcesClient correspondence · Contracts & amendments · Matter files & evidence · Your firm’s document templates · Approved legal sources
Try the template drafting demo02 / COMPLEX LEGAL WORK, MADE TANGIBLEThe application
The application
your team will work with.
Three documents.
One question that matters.
Sources3
Task instructionsPreset
Compare the termination provisions across these documents and identify what counsel needs to resolve.
Findings3 Example results
Source-linked findingsLegal assessment and approval stay with your lawyers.
Your implementation would use your approved legal model, your document templates and matter access permissions.
03 / OUR SERVICE
We build your firm’s
We build your firm’s
legal AI workspace.
Model selection, local fine-tuning and workflow development, delivered as one service. We start with one team and one agreed legal task in your firm’s own environment.
THE STARTING SCOPE
One team. One workflow. An evaluated pilot.
Before building, we agree the model, hardware, source access, integrations, support arrangements and acceptance criteria.
What your firm receives
A local legal model
We select and install a model, then fine-tune it locally using examples your firm approves.
A private source library
We connect the agreed documents and firm templates, with access defined for each user and matter.
A tool for your workflow
We build a working tool for the chosen task, using your templates and your lawyers’ review steps.
Evaluation and handover
We test with your lawyers and provide an evaluation report, team training and a user guide.
04 / YOUR PILOT ROADMAPFive steps.
5 stagesFive steps.
From brief to handover.
-
Together
Define the pilot
Agree one legal task, approved sources and success criteria with your lawyers and IT contact.
You receiveWritten pilot plan -
Safe Prompt
Prepare the setup
Agree hardware and source access, select and install the local model, and configure permissions.
You receivePrivate workspace ready -
Safe Prompt
Build your tool
Fine-tune the model using approved examples and build the selected workflow around your firm’s rules.
You receiveWorking legal AI pilot -
Together
Evaluate together
Your lawyers review sources, missed issues, draft quality and time spent against the agreed criteria.
You receiveEvaluation report -
Together
Hand over
Train the users, provide operating guidance and agree support arrangements and the next steps.
You receiveTrained team and user guide
Review before handover
The findings determine whether we hand over, refine the pilot or stop. We make that decision together.
What we need from your firm
A pilot owner
A lead lawyer and an IT contact to agree the scope, hardware, access and installation.
One defined legal task
A recurring task, its jurisdiction and working languages, and examples of a useful result.
Approved example material
Representative documents, firm templates and drafting rules you may use. Fine-tuning examples require separate approval.
Time for review
A small group of users to test the tool and assess its outputs against the criteria agreed for the pilot.
After the pilot
If the pilot meets your requirements, we agree a separate scope for wider rollout, additional workflows, updates and ongoing support.
QUESTIONS FROM LEGAL TEAMSBefore you
Before you
open the file.
What makes the model specialised for legal work?+
We select a model with legal-domain training, then evaluate it against the language, document types and tasks in your chosen practice. Local fine-tuning can adapt it to approved drafting examples and guidelines. The specific model, training material and acceptance criteria are agreed for your pilot.
Do our client files become training data?+
Only material you explicitly approve belongs in a fine-tuning dataset. A matter file can instead be retrieved as a source for a task, without being used to train the model. We scope training rights, document permissions, retention and access separately with your firm.
Which jurisdictions and legal sources can it cover?+
Your pilot defines the jurisdictions, working languages and approved source collections. Access to current law, case law and commentary depends on the material and licences available to your firm. Updates and source currency need an agreed process; legal training alone does not ensure that an answer reflects current law.
Can it work with our document and matter systems?+
We review your document management system, matter structure and access controls during discovery. Integration depends on supported interfaces and permissions. We agree a focused source collection for the pilot before widening access.
Does using local AI guarantee confidentiality or compliance?+
Local operation gives your firm a way to control where the model and documents run. Confidentiality, privilege and compliance still depend on the full setup, people and policies. We scope access controls, logs, updates, backups, external connections and remote support with your requirements in mind.
What remains the lawyer’s responsibility?+
Legal interpretation, strategy, client advice and final approval. The assistant prepares, connects and drafts. Your lawyers verify the sources, identify missing context and decide whether its output is fit for the matter. The pilot explicitly tests how the tool behaves when evidence is incomplete.
A LEGAL AI ENVIRONMENT THAT BELONGS TO YOUR FIRM
Your first workflow.
A clear pilot plan.
Tell us about your firm
and what you’d like to explore.